Gwyde wrote:The rationale for investing in gold bullion by way of elimination.
Nothing really is what it claims to be:
- Equity isn't equitable,
- Securities aren't secure,
- Bonds don't really bind debtor to creditor, (instead they're traded, renegotiated and get CDS's interposed)
- Gold delivery contracts are bets between a seller who doesn't own and a buyer who doesn't want to purchase and take delivery...
- Only gold bullion remains gold bullion...
We could also say that all tangibles are what they are, but yes as far as those for whom other tangibles have been affected by diminishing marginal utility are concerned, gold is where its at.
Indy wrote:Do you really think they want an honest financial system like freegold for us the people?
Maybe you believe so, but I don’t.
I don't believe it comes down to what some nefarious group want, at the end of the day.
It comes down to what the market wants, and Gwyde has succinctly identified the logic which will eventually attain critical mass in the consciousness of said market.
I understand your thinking; I thought that way myself for much of my life (fatalistically) but I do so no longer.
To be fatalistic is to unnecessarily surrender your sovereignty, your power to make your own choices. En masse fatalism is what gives these groups you speak of their power. Individuals give it away. I think you are underestimating the scope of the pending change, and quite what effects seemingly small changes may produce.
Sometimes things change, but only when they must.